Review



mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system  (Compumedics Neuroscan)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Compumedics Neuroscan mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system
    Schematic diagram of <t>simultaneous</t> <t>Neuroscan</t> (in grey) and <t>EPOC</t> (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.
    Mmn Waveforms Generated By The Neuroscan System, supplied by Compumedics Neuroscan, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system/product/Compumedics Neuroscan
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children"

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    Journal: PeerJ

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Schematic diagram of simultaneous Neuroscan (in grey) and EPOC (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic diagram of simultaneous Neuroscan (in grey) and EPOC (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.

    Techniques Used: Transmission Assay

    Schematic diagram depicting the placement of EEG electrodes for Neuroscan (blue targets) and EPOC (orange crosses) systems.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic diagram depicting the placement of EEG electrodes for Neuroscan (blue targets) and EPOC (orange crosses) systems.

    Techniques Used:

    Median number of accepted and shared epochs for Neuroscan and EPOC by condition and tone type. Median (inter-quartile range) number of accepted epochs for the Neuroscan and EPOC systems and total number of epochs shared (i.e. accepted for both systems) between systems in each condition (passive and active) for each tone type (standard, deviant, and total). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests ( Z ) were used to test the difference between systems.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Median number of accepted and shared epochs for Neuroscan and EPOC by condition and tone type. Median (inter-quartile range) number of accepted epochs for the Neuroscan and EPOC systems and total number of epochs shared (i.e. accepted for both systems) between systems in each condition (passive and active) for each tone type (standard, deviant, and total). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests ( Z ) were used to test the difference between systems.

    Techniques Used:

    All graphs display the group average ERP waveforms for the passive (ignore tones) and active (count deviant tones) listening conditions. Data collected with Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and ERPs to the deviant (high) tones are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).
    Figure Legend Snippet: All graphs display the group average ERP waveforms for the passive (ignore tones) and active (count deviant tones) listening conditions. Data collected with Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and ERPs to the deviant (high) tones are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Techniques Used:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP and MMN waveform intraclass correlations. Mean intraclass correlations (ICC) (with 95% confidence intervals) between Neuroscan and EPOC late auditory P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3 ERPs and the MMN component at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 to standard and deviant tones in both passive and active conditions. Single-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test p -values are represented.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP and MMN waveform intraclass correlations. Mean intraclass correlations (ICC) (with 95% confidence intervals) between Neuroscan and EPOC late auditory P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3 ERPs and the MMN component at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 to standard and deviant tones in both passive and active conditions. Single-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test p -values are represented.

    Techniques Used:

    Data collected with the Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) and deviant (high) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and the difference between these waveforms (i.e., the mismatch negativity responses) are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Data collected with the Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) and deviant (high) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and the difference between these waveforms (i.e., the mismatch negativity responses) are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Techniques Used:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system ERP peak comparisons: active listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measure at sites F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the active condition.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system ERP peak comparisons: active listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measure at sites F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the active condition.

    Techniques Used:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP peak comparisons: passive listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures at sties F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the passive condition.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP peak comparisons: passive listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures at sties F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the passive condition.

    Techniques Used:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system P3 and MMN peak comparisons. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Wilcoxon Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures produced by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for the P3 ERP peak (to deviant tones in the active condition) and the MMN ERP component (the difference between ERPs to standard and deviant tones in the passive condition).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system P3 and MMN peak comparisons. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Wilcoxon Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures produced by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for the P3 ERP peak (to deviant tones in the active condition) and the MMN ERP component (the difference between ERPs to standard and deviant tones in the passive condition).

    Techniques Used: Produced



    Similar Products

    mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system  (Compumedics Neuroscan)
    90
    Compumedics Neuroscan mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system
    Schematic diagram of <t>simultaneous</t> <t>Neuroscan</t> (in grey) and <t>EPOC</t> (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.
    Mmn Waveforms Generated By The Neuroscan System, supplied by Compumedics Neuroscan, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system/product/Compumedics Neuroscan
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mmn waveforms generated by the neuroscan system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Schematic diagram of simultaneous Neuroscan (in grey) and EPOC (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram of simultaneous Neuroscan (in grey) and EPOC (in black) setup, including infrared transmission for EPOC event markers.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques: Transmission Assay

    Schematic diagram depicting the placement of EEG electrodes for Neuroscan (blue targets) and EPOC (orange crosses) systems.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram depicting the placement of EEG electrodes for Neuroscan (blue targets) and EPOC (orange crosses) systems.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Median number of accepted and shared epochs for Neuroscan and EPOC by condition and tone type. Median (inter-quartile range) number of accepted epochs for the Neuroscan and EPOC systems and total number of epochs shared (i.e. accepted for both systems) between systems in each condition (passive and active) for each tone type (standard, deviant, and total). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests ( Z ) were used to test the difference between systems.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Median number of accepted and shared epochs for Neuroscan and EPOC by condition and tone type. Median (inter-quartile range) number of accepted epochs for the Neuroscan and EPOC systems and total number of epochs shared (i.e. accepted for both systems) between systems in each condition (passive and active) for each tone type (standard, deviant, and total). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests ( Z ) were used to test the difference between systems.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    All graphs display the group average ERP waveforms for the passive (ignore tones) and active (count deviant tones) listening conditions. Data collected with Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and ERPs to the deviant (high) tones are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: All graphs display the group average ERP waveforms for the passive (ignore tones) and active (count deviant tones) listening conditions. Data collected with Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and ERPs to the deviant (high) tones are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP and MMN waveform intraclass correlations. Mean intraclass correlations (ICC) (with 95% confidence intervals) between Neuroscan and EPOC late auditory P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3 ERPs and the MMN component at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 to standard and deviant tones in both passive and active conditions. Single-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test p -values are represented.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP and MMN waveform intraclass correlations. Mean intraclass correlations (ICC) (with 95% confidence intervals) between Neuroscan and EPOC late auditory P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3 ERPs and the MMN component at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 to standard and deviant tones in both passive and active conditions. Single-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test p -values are represented.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Data collected with the Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) and deviant (high) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and the difference between these waveforms (i.e., the mismatch negativity responses) are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Data collected with the Neuroscan and EPOC are presented in the left and right columns respectively, ERPs to the standard (low) and deviant (high) tones are presented in panels A, B, E, & F, and the difference between these waveforms (i.e., the mismatch negativity responses) are presented in panels C, D, G, & H. The upper four panels depicted ERPs from the left-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F3: A & C; EPOC = AF3: B & D) and the lower four panels depicted ERPs from the right-hemisphere (Neuroscan = F4: E & G; EPOC = AF4: F & H).

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system ERP peak comparisons: active listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measure at sites F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the active condition.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system ERP peak comparisons: active listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measure at sites F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the active condition.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP peak comparisons: passive listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures at sties F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the passive condition.

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC ERP peak comparisons: passive listening. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak (P1, N1, P2, N2) amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures at sties F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for Neuroscan versus EPOC in the passive condition.

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques:

    Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system P3 and MMN peak comparisons. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Wilcoxon Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures produced by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for the P3 ERP peak (to deviant tones in the active condition) and the MMN ERP component (the difference between ERPs to standard and deviant tones in the passive condition).

    Journal: PeerJ

    Article Title: Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system P3 and MMN peak comparisons. Descriptive ( n , M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential ( t or Wilcoxon Z and Cohen’s d ) statistics for peak amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures produced by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for the P3 ERP peak (to deviant tones in the active condition) and the MMN ERP component (the difference between ERPs to standard and deviant tones in the passive condition).

    Article Snippet: The ICCs between the MMN waveforms generated by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems are shown in .

    Techniques: Produced